Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | EvoDevo

Fig. 1

From: Sex-specific plasticity and the nutritional geometry of insulin-signaling gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster

Fig. 1

The effect of protein and carbohydrate concentration on female and male body size and sexual size dimorphism (SSD). a, b Surfaces show the fitted relationship between body size (PC1 from a PCA on the size of four body parts), carbohydrate level and protein level in female and male flies, based on the statistical model specified by the equation above each chart. T = body size, P = protein, C = carbohydrate, ε = error, subscripts refer to levels within each factor. c Surface shows the difference in female and male body size (SSD: female size – male size) across the same nutritional landscape, using fitted values from a and b. Points indicate diets tested and dotted lines connect diets with equal protein-to-carbohydrate ratios (1:14.6, 1:7.2, 1:3.5, 1:1.7, 1.3:1, 1.4:1). Asterisk indicates approximate composition of standard cornmeal–molasses medium. Corresponding thin-plate spline plots are shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1

Back to article page